Sunday, June 26, 2011

For the sake of it

“Why do I write, if I can’t write any better? But what would become of me if I didn’t write what I can, however inferior it may be to what I am? In my ambitions, I am a plebeian, because I try to achieve; like someone in a dark room, I’m afraid to be silent. I’m like those who prize the medal more than the struggle to get it, and savour glory with a fur-lined cape.” (Fernando Pessoa, The Book of Disquiet, 152)

Pessoa writes so much better than I. Until my thoughts are focused by a certain mysterious elation, I cannot write, in the sense of expressing anything publishable. But when I enter this mystery, and let it translate itself into words, something transcends the plebeian inferiority.

I took a trip to Iver, a village in the extreme south-east corner of Buckinghamshire, drawn by some sense of affinity. Iver, Bucks: I never went there before but once lived a few miles away, if ‘lived’ is the right word, for it was little more than a postal address while I was at boarding school and university. For most of my life I’ve not really lived anywhere: not exactly a rolling stone, more an uprooted plant. So I went to Iver in search of something. It would be hard to say what, but I found it after five yards of following the public footpaths that led off the High Street. In a moment, it was as if something inside tuned to a frequency, and pretty much stayed locked on to it from there on. I became alert to things, both around and within, as if the mere sensual inputs held a significance, something apprehended yet not quite understood.

“From birth to death, man is the slave of the same external dimension that rules animals. Throughout his life he doesn’t live, he vegetatively thrives, with greater intensity and complexity than an animal. He’s guided by norms without knowing that they guide him or even that they exist, and all his ideas, feelings and acts are unconscious—not because there’s no consciousness in them but because there aren’t two consciousnesses.

“Flashes of awareness that we live an illusion—that, and no more, is what distinguishes the greatest of men.”
(ibid,150)

Further on, the footpath was fenced on either side, cutting a meadow in two. There were horses on either side: curious, friendly. A mare stood guard over two resting foals, born in different seasons, so still, as they lay prone, that I thought they might be dead. But they were just relaxed. Later, the younger one became shy, and hid behind the mother.

Still further, I saw a giant hogweed in the hedgerow, about nine foot tall. I had a vague idea that handsome as they were, these weeds are undesirable in some way. I checked the Web later, and confirmed that they are very toxic. There were signs that someone had been cutting them down, but hadn’t finished the job. The sap can cause blistery burns whose scars last for years, I learned; or blindness and even death. I’m glad I didn’t get too close. I entered ‘giant hogweed Iver’ into Google and discovered that another walker had photographed the same ones a few days previously (Beeches Way, 18th June, on a site called Pete’s Walks). We are ruled by our enthusiasms. Whatever gives us a buzz, we endlessly seek to repeat it. One day I might run into Pete.

At one point, the paths forked, so I stopped to check the map. I noticed a pair of mature trees whose trunks were so close together that they touched at the base, with their barks fused together. Higher up, the same thing had happened to some major branches. Not uncommon, you may say: but one was an oak and one a horse-chestnut, both displaying their immature fruit. Did their saps combine? Had they grafted themselves together, to produce a hybrid? No, I think it is just a phenomenon of bark. It adapts. It can grow over barbed wire if necessary. Parasites like orchids and mistletoe can penetrate through bark, without any exchange of DNA. Two lovers, however close, don’t merge and become one flesh. Donne notwithstanding, every man or woman is an island.

“If I often interrupt a thought with a scenic description that in some way fits in to the real or imagined scheme of my impressions, it’s because the scenery is a door through which I flee from my awareness of my creative impotence.” (ibid,152)

Here, Fernando, take over this keyboard. Take this site for your own. You are the writer! I’m just a reader. I could happily leave the stage to you, and stay silent in my wayfaring, for I’m not sure if I have anything to say. I just “vegetatively thrive”. And part of this is to be instinctive like a bird, to stand on the highest branch and sing whatever joyful song comes out.

-------------







The Colne Valley Trail, the Beeches Way and Route 61 of the National Cycle Network have transformed derelict farmland into a park or nature reserve, close to the M25, London’s outer ring-road motorway. Here you may see oak and chestnut in close embrace, and foals frolicking next to their mare.

9 comments:

darev2005 said...

Well in my opinion, you are a writer and more entertaining that Fernando. Your words paint a constantly moving picture of your world in my mind while my eyes scan down the page. His words made me have to stop and try to comprehend what he was saying. He writes like a lawyer... a solicitor. Pedantic and precise. Your words flow and are almost poetic in their rhythm. But that's just my opinion.

Bryan M. White said...

I'm going to have to side with the Rev on this one, although I'll give Pessoa a bit more credit than he does. There is some good stuff there. Still, the light grey is a welcome interlude between the solid black. I definitely prefer the grey.

...and I thought I had some nasty weeds growing in my yard. Good lord, those hogweeds must be rooted in Hell itself!!

Vincent said...

Your responses are flattering and therefore pleasing, but I’m embarrassed too in case anyone thinks it was a setup to try and compare my writing with his. The fact is this: I can write easy stuff. Pessoa in the words I quoted manages to say difficult stuff, confidently and succinctly. So naturally it is not as easy to read as stuff which is easy to write.

Still, my purpose was not to compare, but lazily to use his ready-made words as proxy for similar things that I have wanted to say but not been able.

Bryan M. White said...

That thought never crossed my mind. I just figured you were cherry picking a few selections from a writer you admired.

Bryan M. White said...

Also, I wouldn't characterize your writing as "easy", at least not in the way I take your meaning. It's easy to read as it has an eloquent flow, as well compelling imagery to draw you along. But I most definitely wouldn't call it "easy" in the sense of being simplistic or unambitious. If fact, it's often quite ornate, and when you do tackle a difficult and profound idea you always find an interesting way of putting it.

susan said...

I too think you write very well if the description of that skill is that your audience gets caught up in your thought process. The marvelous thing about walking in a natural environment is the acceptance of the glory of being alive. You portrayed that feeling beautifully even without the photographs, but I did love the pictures.

darev2005 said...

Perhaps it was because Pessoa spoke Portuguese as a first language or the fact that he had that style that was so popular around the turn of the century. His words are strong, no doubt. But since I was educated in this century and not that one that your words flow more smoothly in my mind. I wasn't just trying to blow you up, as I think the phrase goes.

Vincent said...

Glad you appreciated it Susan. I am finding it difficult now to think of you as Gina, but will get there! (I say to myself, oh, Gina--that's really Susan.)

Vincent said...

Bryan & Rev: I'm realizing once again from this that it's risky to try and convey one's enthusiasm by quotations; just as risky in fact as trying to convey the beauty of one's experience with the aid of photographs.

But then, art is risky, communication is risky, in the sense that you cannot control how the expression is received by others. For me, blogging is in large measure a training course in creative expression, via the feedback. Which is ultimately my own feedback to myself because I interpret the comments in the same risky manner.

Post a Comment