Sunday, March 28, 2010

“I fought the law . . . the law won”

I wake up this Sunday morning at 2.30—except that it’s 3.30 because the clocks have moved forward, robbing everyone of an hour that will not be restored till next November. Or perhaps the clocks are claiming back the additional hour they loaned us last November: it is pointless to ask which because the notion is illusory. Moving the hands on a clock may be a reality in society’s terms, but I am free to accept its terms or distance myself from them. I can be some kind of outlaw from the norms of society, which may lead to the situation immortalised in the song I fought the law: “. . . the law won”. See, for example, this rendering by The Clash; an article on the song in Wikipedia, which supplied my illustration; the lyrics of the song.

I sometimes wonder what is meant by “freedom”. In the February cold, I had to wait for four hours outside the US Embassy in Grosvenor Square whilst K was interviewed for a visa, not to visit the USA as a tourist or on business, but to be a transit passenger in Miami, for our plane stops there whilst we journey on to Jamaica. Morosely, I tried to get warm, periodically availing myself of toilet facilities in a nearby Starbucks café, which smelt bad (the café itself, not the restroom therein). In the end, against better instincts I bought a mug of hot chocolate there to try and defrost my body, for out in the windy Square I felt almost as naked as mad King Lear in a storm. There’s a statue near the Embassy, erected in memory of Dwight D Eisenhower, surrounded by a circle of polished granite benches, where I was able to shelter a little, but not of course sit down. That would quickly have drained away the scant warmth remaining in my body. On the plinth were incised some quotations, which momentarily inspired in me some distinctly unamerican feelings.

“Soldiers, Sailors, and Airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force: You are about to embark upon a great crusade... the hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you.”

“The faith we hold belongs not to us alone but to the free of all the world.”

Thanks to America’s arrangements for its own defense (I allow it to retain its own spelling of the word “defence”) I felt ruthlessly deprived of my own liberty. I didn’t want to be there, but I had no idea when K would be out and she had not been allowed to take a mobile phone inside. She spent most of her time in a comfortable lounge on the Embassy’s third floor, waiting to be interviewed, observing my morose pacings back and forth through the window; and unsuccessfully trying to catch my attention.

I remained alone with the towering figure of Eisenhower. Margaret Thatcher was present in 1989 when the statue was unveiled. I am sure sure she approved the brave words inscribed on the plinth. Is the world really divided between those who love liberty and those who don’t? Many think it is. The fact that it’s hardly possible to imagine someone who hates liberty makes it seem more essential to wage war on such people; for whoever they are they must be sinister, inhuman and evil, to be expunged from the world like a plague, even if hosts of innocents get caught in the crossfire. Personally I think the existence of such creatures is a lot less likely than Bigfoot or the Abominable Snowman.

Though I directed my bitter thoughts against poor Eisenhower that morning, as if he were personally responsible for my short-lived plight, I do accept he had legitimate reasons for saying what he said: (a) the Allied landings to drive the Nazis from France, June 6th 1944; (b) his inauguration as President in 1953, six months before an armistice ended the Korean War. His rallying cries of “freedom”, “liberty”, were fit for purpose in those contexts, I guess, considering the plight of the French in ’44 and of the North Koreans even today. None of this stopped me cursing him and his country on that February morning.

As Donovan sang, “Freedom is a word I rarely use/Without thinkin’, mm hmm . . .” The freedom I cherish is not to fight the law—I expect the law to win, and don’t think of it as a worthy opponent, even when it’s wrong. I cherish the freedom to take an imaginary holiday from society’s values. This is a theme worth getting up to write about in the middle of the night. (Though I had no theme in mind when I started this.) It’s as though I live in one of those European cities with trams, which ply back and forth on the same routes, dictated by tramlines embedded in the cobbled streets. Only in imagination, perhaps fuelled by written words (mine or yours), can I get on the tram to take a holiday beyond the reach of those tramlines. Off we go, beyond the city walls, beyond the outermost suburbs, in the direction of the misty mountains, or the great blue curve of a bay, dotted with islands stretching to the horizon.

12 comments:

raymond said...

"You are about to embark upon a great crusade..."

And that's the way these "great" men still talk today, as they have always done. I would rather have said "an unfortunate errand."

Laozi: "Don't celebrate your victory, cry for the people you had to kill."

Vincent said...

Well, I wonder. I'm seeing a different attitude about Afghanistan these days and I can imagine British or American commanders speaking of an unfortunate errand.

Of course it is necessary to make sure that the soldiers who may lose their lives believe that it is in a worthy cause. It is not beyond possibility that soldiers cry for the people they have to kill, but it will be always less than for their own comrades.

Though I don't confess to the notion of progress, at least overall, I think there is a marked and ever-increasing sensitivity to the sufferings of others. This Pope-Catholic-child-abuse thing, for example. I know from my own childhood (fortunately without any serious direct experience) how the proclivities of priests, choirmasters and scoutmasters were the subject of jokes, with a general understanding that "scandals" would be covered up. Victims would keep quiet, everyone would keep quiet. The general sense was that terrible things do happen, let's pray that we'll all be safe. Whereas today there is a sense that all evil can, should and must be eliminated.

I say "evil" but that doesn't mean I believe in evil as a kind of malign entity: only in "evil consequences" - i.e. hurt to someone. I don't necessarily believe in good either, as a kind of wonderful God-attribute which must overcome all evil. I just see the world and our vulnerability; and the statistical probability that 80% of people are well-meaning to others, law-abiding and so forth. (I'm grateful to Hayden for that 80%. It seems a bit low, really.)

ZACL said...

I hope the outcome was worth the inconvenience and the wait in the cold.

I remember sitting on wooden slatted seats in the nearby gardens, admittedly. a different season, warmer and dry. I looked at the stone blocks, the barricades that in my youth, were not around the Embassy. Sure, there were demonstrations against the Vietnam war, notwithstanding that there were no permanently concreted barricades on the street outside the U.S. Embassy.

We have given up so many of our freedoms to move freely around our own home land, not just the relative ease of movement we used to have going around the world.

GMT-v- BST: is that simply just another barging in on our freedom to rest as we wish. I am not so sure, this is a subject of different perspectives.

Hayden said...

(I've read similar studies since, vincent, and while the gap and proportion appears to hold as a general thing, it's alarming to notice that in certain occupations it nearly reverses! Whether that is the result of cultural pressure or self-selection - i.e, misanthropes chose certain occupations - I don't know.)

Charles Bergeman said...

Are we truly free?

http://www.ted.com/talks/kevin_bales_how_to_combat_modern_slavery.html

Asclepius said...

I once heard a comment on freedom that has haunted me for years - "Something given has no value" it has to be earned through toil and blood so those who lived when freedom was at threat can appreciate it.

This troubles me because the wars great and last are almost out of living memory and the abuse of basic freedoms is evident everywhere.

However I like to believe that true freedom doesnt require any external factors -
Stone walls do not a prison make,
Nor iron bars a cage;
Minds innocent and quiet take
That for an hermitage

As a side note I also once heard "why would anyone want to be a hero, all heroes sleep six feet beneath the ground".

Vincent said...

Thanks Charles, but in general I don't watch videos of talks. It would be so much quicker to get the gist from a transcript and so much less infuriating.

As for slavery, it seems to me that the worst slavery on earth today is enslaved thought, where people cannot think for themselves. A physical slave just might have that freedom---something that a wealthy overworked Westerner wouldn't even understand.

Vincent said...

Asclepius, your quoted verse echoes my previous comment---that freedom is an inner thing.

Those who say that freedom has to be earned through toil and blood are usually referring to someone else's toil and blood, not their own. Fortunately for them, there are young men in every age willing to go for the danger and thrill of war. If young women are joining up too, then things are getting a little complicated.

Vincent said...

ZACL, we have the visa and the visa-waiver now, but I remain a little traumatised by the whole thing, sensitively reacting to the impersonal paranoia and hating the thought of going through all the checkpoints. I have never had a fear of flying, but the whole airport/immigration thing is bothering me.

As for the time change thing, it's not an issue with me; just an illustration of society's illusion which can be escaped by living in a different consciousness.

Vincent said...

Hayden, now you have me wondering how the ratios are derived and doubting them. If one occupation is more criminal than an other, I start to think of researcher bias.

ZACL said...

The whole travel escapade becomes an exercise in others' paranoia to the point where you have no choice but to collude, if you go down that path.

If freedom is a construct, which in today's world it is, there are many levels on which to try out different comfort and discomfort zones of it on this plane, rather than an airborne one, or for that matter a philosophical one.

I hope your journeys are not too wearisome and that you do get something positive from the travel and visiting experience.

Vincent said...

ZACL, belated thanks for your good wishes. We got so much positive from the travel & visiting experience, some of which appears on subsequent posts.

Post a Comment